In mathematics, specifically multilinear algebra, a dyadic or dyadic tensor is a second order tensor, written in a notation that fits in with Vector calculus.
There are numerous ways to multiply two . The dot product takes in two vectors and returns a scalar, while the cross product returns a pseudovector. Both of these have various significant geometric interpretations and are widely used in mathematics, physics, and engineering. The dyadic product takes in two vectors and returns a second order tensor called a dyadic in this context. A dyadic can be used to contain physical or geometric information, although in general there is no direct way of geometrically interpreting it.
The dyadic product is distributive over vector addition, and associative with scalar multiplication. Therefore, the dyadic product is linear in both of its operands. In general, two dyadics can be added to get another dyadic, and multiplied by numbers to scale the dyadic. However, the product is not commutative; changing the order of the vectors results in a different dyadic.
The formalism of dyadic algebra is an extension of vector algebra to include the dyadic product of vectors. The dyadic product is also associative with the dot and cross products with other vectors, which allows the dot, cross, and dyadic products to be combined to obtain other scalars, vectors, or dyadics.
It also has some aspects of matrix algebra, as the numerical components of vectors can be arranged into row and column vectors, and those of second order tensors in square matrix. Also, the dot, cross, and dyadic products can all be expressed in matrix form. Dyadic expressions may closely resemble the matrix equivalents.
The dot product of a dyadic with a vector gives another vector, and taking the dot product of this result gives a scalar derived from the dyadic. The effect that a given dyadic has on other vectors can provide indirect physical or geometric interpretations.
Dyadic notation was first established by Josiah Willard Gibbs in 1884. The notation and terminology are relatively obsolete today. Its uses in physics include continuum mechanics and electromagnetism.
In this article, upper-case bold variables denote dyadics (including dyads) whereas lower-case bold variables denote vectors. An alternative notation uses respectively double and single over- or underbars.
There are several equivalent terms and notations for this product:
In the dyadic context they all have the same definition and meaning, and are used synonymously, although the tensor product is an instance of the more general and abstract use of the term.
\mathbf{a} &= a_1 \mathbf{i} + a_2 \mathbf{j} + a_3 \mathbf{k} \\ \mathbf{b} &= b_1 \mathbf{i} + b_2 \mathbf{j} + b_3 \mathbf{k}\end{align} be two vectors where i, j, k (also denoted e1, e2, e3) are the standard basis vectors in this vector space (see also Cartesian coordinates). Then the dyadic product of a and b can be represented as a sum:
\mathbf{ab} =\qquad &a_1 b_1 \mathbf{ii} + a_1 b_2 \mathbf{ij} + a_1 b_3 \mathbf{ik} \\ {}+{} &a_2 b_1 \mathbf{ji} + a_2 b_2 \mathbf{jj} + a_2 b_3 \mathbf{jk} \\ {}+{} &a_3 b_1 \mathbf{ki} + a_3 b_2 \mathbf{kj} + a_3 b_3 \mathbf{kk}\end{align} or by extension from row and column vectors, a 3×3 matrix (also the result of the outer product or tensor product of a and b):
\mathbf{a b} \equiv \mathbf{a}\otimes\mathbf{b} \equiv \mathbf{a b}^\mathsf{T} = \begin{pmatrix} a_1 \\ a_2 \\ a_3 \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} b_1 & b_2 & b_3 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} a_1 b_1 & a_1 b_2 & a_1 b_3 \\ a_2 b_1 & a_2 b_2 & a_2 b_3 \\ a_3 b_1 & a_3 b_2 & a_3 b_3 \end{pmatrix}.
A dyad is a component of the dyadic (a monomial of the sum or equivalently an entry of the matrix) — the dyadic product of a pair of scalar multiplied by a number.
Just as the standard basis (and unit) vectors i, j, k, have the representations:
\mathbf{i} &= \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix},& \mathbf{j} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix},& \mathbf{k} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}\end{align} (which can be transposed), the standard basis (and unit) dyads have the representation:
\mathbf{ii} &= \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, & \mathbf{ij} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, & \mathbf{ik} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \\ \mathbf{ji} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, & \mathbf{jj} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, & \mathbf{jk} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \\ \mathbf{ki} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, & \mathbf{kj} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, & \mathbf{kk} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}\end{align}
For a simple numerical example in the standard basis:
\mathbf{A} &= 2\mathbf{ij} + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\mathbf{ji} - 8\pi\mathbf{jk} + \frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3}\mathbf{kk} \\[2pt] &= 2 \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} - 8\pi \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} + \frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3}\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \\[2pt] &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 & 0 \\ \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} & 0 & -8\pi \\ 0 & 0 & \frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3} \end{pmatrix}\end{align}
\mathbf{a} &= \sum_{i=1}^N a_i\mathbf{e}_i = a_1 \mathbf{e}_1 + a_2 \mathbf{e}_2 + {\ldots} + a_N \mathbf{e}_N \\ \mathbf{b} &= \sum_{j=1}^N b_j\mathbf{e}_j = b_1 \mathbf{e}_1 + b_2 \mathbf{e}_2 + \ldots + b_N \mathbf{e}_N\end{align} where e i and e j are the standard basis vectors in N-dimensions (the index i on e i selects a specific vector, not a component of the vector as in ai), then in algebraic form their dyadic product is:
This is known as the nonion form of the dyadic. Their outer/tensor product in matrix form is:
\mathbf{ab} = \mathbf{ab}^\mathsf{T} = \begin{pmatrix} a_1 \\ a_2 \\ \vdots \\ a_N \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} b_1 & b_2 & \cdots & b_N \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} a_1 b_1 & a_1 b_2 & \cdots & a_1 b_N \\ a_2 b_1 & a_2 b_2 & \cdots & a_2 b_N \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ a_N b_1 & a_N b_2 & \cdots & a_N b_N \end{pmatrix}.
A dyadic polynomial A, otherwise known as a dyadic, is formed from multiple vectors a i and b j:
\mathbf{A} = \sum_i\mathbf{a}_i\mathbf{b}_i = \mathbf{a}_1\mathbf{b}_1 + \mathbf{a}_2\mathbf{b}_2 + \mathbf{a}_3\mathbf{b}_3 + \ldots
A dyadic which cannot be reduced to a sum of less than N dyads is said to be complete. In this case, the forming vectors are non-coplanar, see Chen (1983).
Letting
\operatorname{tr}\left(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{B}^\mathsf{T}\right) &=\sum_{i,j} \operatorname{tr}\left(\mathbf{a}_i \mathbf{b}_i^\mathsf{T} \mathbf{d}_j \mathbf{c}_j^\mathsf{T}\right) \\ &=\sum_{i,j} \operatorname{tr}\left(\mathbf{c}_j^\mathsf{T} \mathbf{a}_i \mathbf{b}_i^\mathsf{T} \mathbf{d}_j\right) \\ &=\sum_{i,j} (\mathbf{a}_i\cdot\mathbf{c}_j)(\mathbf{b}_i\cdot\mathbf{d}_j) \\ &=\mathbf{A} {}_\centerdot^\centerdot \mathbf{B}\end{align}
Furthermore, since,
\mathbf{A}^\mathsf{T} &=\sum_{i,j} \left(\mathbf{a}_i\mathbf{b}_j^\mathsf{T}\right)^\mathsf{T} \\ &=\sum_{i,j} \mathbf{b}_i\mathbf{a}_j^\mathsf{T}\end{align} we get that,
In the standard basis (for definitions of i, j, k see in the above section ),
Explicitly, the dot product to the right of the unit dyadic is
The corresponding matrix is
1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1\\\end{pmatrix}
This can be put on more careful foundations (explaining what the logical content of "juxtaposing notation" could possibly mean) using the language of tensor products. If V is a finite-dimensional vector space, a dyadic tensor on V is an elementary tensor in the tensor product of V with its dual space.
The tensor product of V and its dual space is isomorphic to the space of from V to V: a dyadic tensor vf is simply the linear map sending any w in V to f( w) v. When V is Euclidean n-space, we can use the inner product to identify the dual space with V itself, making a dyadic tensor an elementary tensor product of two vectors in Euclidean space.
In this sense, the unit dyadic ij is the function from 3-space to itself sending a1 i + a2 j + a3 k to a2 i, and jj sends this sum to a2 j. Now it is revealed in what (precise) sense ii + jj + kk is the identity: it sends a1 i + a2 j + a3 k to itself because its effect is to sum each unit vector in the standard basis scaled by the coefficient of the vector in that basis.
\left(\mathbf{a}\times\mathbf{I}\right)\cdot\left(\mathbf{b}\times\mathbf{I}\right) &= \mathbf{ba} - \left(\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b}\right)\mathbf{I} \\ \mathbf{I} {}_\times^{\,\centerdot} \left(\mathbf{ab}\right) &= \mathbf{b}\times\mathbf{a} \\ \mathbf{I} {}_\times^\times \mathbf{A} &= (\mathbf{A} {}_{\,\centerdot}^{\,\centerdot} \mathbf{I})\mathbf{I} - \mathbf{A}^\mathsf{T} \\ \mathbf{I} {}_{\,\centerdot}^{\,\centerdot} \left(\mathbf{ab}\right) &= \left(\mathbf{I}\cdot\mathbf{a}\right)\cdot\mathbf{b} = \mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} = \mathrm{tr}\left(\mathbf{ab}\right)\end{align} where "tr" denotes the trace.
The parallel component is found by vector projection, which is equivalent to the dot product of a with the dyadic nn,
0 & -1 \\ 1 & 0\end{pmatrix} is a 90° anticlockwise rotation operator in 2d. It can be left-dotted with a vector r = x i + yj to produce the vector,
0 & -1 \\ 1 & 0\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}
x \\ y\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix} -y \\
x\end{pmatrix}.
For any angle θ, the 2d rotation dyadic for a rotation anti-clockwise in the plane is
The effect of Ω on a is the cross product
|
|